Skip to content

Approaching: Nov 20, 2026 — HCS 2024 Deadline. Get ready →

General Industry (29 CFR 1910)

General Requirements for All Machines

Verified vs OSHA sources · 2026-10-05

29 CFR 1910.212

29 CFR 1910.212 is OSHA's general machine-guarding standard: employers must guard machine hazards (points of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, and flying chips or sparks) to protect the operator and other workers in the area. It is one of OSHA's most-cited standards and a leading source of amputation citations.

#10 Most-Cited Standard

29 CFR 1910.212 at a glance

What it requires
Guard machines to protect operators and others from moving-part hazards
Hazards covered
Point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks
Key duty
Guard the point of operation on any machine whose operation can injure an employee
Pairs with
Lockout/Tagout (1910.147): guarding protects during operation; LOTO during servicing
Max penalty (2026)
$16,550 per serious violation; $165,514 per willful
The #1 confusion
Machine guarding (normal production) vs. LOTO (servicing/maintenance) are different standards

What 29 CFR 1910.212 requires (plain English)

29 CFR 1910.212 sets the general machine-guarding requirements for all machines in general industry. Moving machine parts cause thousands of amputations, lacerations, and crushing injuries every year, and 1910.212 is the baseline requirement that machines be guarded so that operators and nearby workers cannot contact those hazards during normal operation. It applies broadly: any machine not covered by a more specific standard (such as the ones for mechanical power presses or woodworking machinery) still must meet 1910.212.

The standard requires one or more methods of machine guarding to protect against hazards created by the point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, and flying chips and sparks. The point of operation (the area where the machine actually cuts, shapes, or forms the material) must be guarded whenever its operation exposes an employee to injury, and the guard must keep any part of the body out of the danger zone during the operating cycle. Barrier guards, two-hand controls, presence-sensing devices, and similar methods are acceptable where they meet the requirement. Guards themselves must not create a hazard (no new pinch points or unguarded openings).

Machines designed for a fixed location must be securely anchored to prevent them from moving or 'walking' during operation. Machine guarding pairs closely with the Lockout/Tagout standard (1910.147): guarding protects workers during normal production, while lockout/tagout protects them during servicing and maintenance when guards may be removed and the machine could unexpectedly start. Machine guarding (1910.212) ranked tenth on OSHA's FY2025 list of most-cited standards, and machinery was the leading source of the severe injuries employers reported to federal OSHA in 2022 and 2023.

The regulatory text

“One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.”
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1)

Key facts about 29 CFR 1910.212

  • Requires one or more guarding methods against point-of-operation, nip-point, rotating-part, and flying-chip/spark hazards (1910.212(a)(1)).
  • The point of operation must be guarded whenever its operation exposes an employee to injury (1910.212(a)(3)(ii)).
  • The guard must prevent any body part from entering the danger zone during the operating cycle.
  • Guards must not themselves create a hazard (no new pinch points or unsafe openings).
  • Machines designed for a fixed location must be securely anchored (1910.212(a)(5)).
  • 1910.212 is the baseline: more specific standards (e.g., 1910.217 power presses) apply where they exist.
  • Pairs with LOTO (1910.147): guarding covers normal production; LOTO covers servicing/maintenance.

Scope: who 29 CFR 1910.212 applies to

Regulatory framework
General Industry (29 CFR 1910)
Citation reference
29 CFR 1910.212
Enforcement status
In force and enforced
Jurisdiction
Federal OSHA (29 State-Plan jurisdictions may be stricter)

State-Plan states (e.g. California, Washington, Michigan) operate OSHA-approved programs that must be at least as effective as federal OSHA and frequently impose higher penalties or additional requirements. Confirm the rule as adopted in your state.

Key requirements of 29 CFR 1910.212

#Employer obligation
1Guard point of operation on all machines
2Anchor machines to prevent walking or movement
3Use barrier guards, two-hand controls, or other devices
4Guards must prevent body parts from contacting danger zone
5Protect against flying chips and sparks

Summarized from the text of 29 CFR 1910.212. Always read the full regulation for the binding language.

Common Machine Guarding violations

Deficiencies OSHA cites under 29 CFR 1910.212 include the ones below, in no particular order. Distinct deficiencies can be cited as separate items, and each serious item carries up to $16,550 (2026). Broader per-instance stacking exists but is a discretionary, case-by-case OSHA enforcement policy, not an automatic multiplier.

  • Point of operation not guarded on a machine that can injure the operator (1910.212(a)(3)(ii)).
  • Exposed ingoing nip points, rotating parts, or belts/pulleys/gears (1910.212(a)(1)).
  • Guards missing, removed, or defeated, or a guard that itself creates a hazard (1910.212(a)(2)).
  • Fixed machinery not anchored to prevent movement (1910.212(a)(5)).
  • No protection from flying chips/sparks (missing shields or PPE): 1910.212(a)(1).

Machine guarding vs. lockout/tagout: production vs. servicing

These two standards protect workers from the same machines but at different times, and are constantly conflated. MACHINE GUARDING (1910.212) protects operators and bystanders during NORMAL PRODUCTION: physical barriers and devices keep hands and bodies out of moving parts while the machine runs. LOCKOUT/TAGOUT (1910.147) protects workers during SERVICING AND MAINTENANCE, when guards may be removed and the machine must be de-energized so it cannot start unexpectedly. A common, dangerous gap is servicing a machine relying only on its guard (a production control) instead of locking out its energy (the servicing control). You generally need both programs: guarding for run-time, LOTO for service-time.

What OSHA inspectors look for

A compliance officer looks for an unguarded point of operation, exposed gears, belts, or rotating shafts, and whether each guard is secured and effective during normal production. They separate guarding (which protects during production) from lockout/tagout (which protects during servicing); a missing point-of-operation guard is the classic amputation finding.

Example: how a violation is cited

A press brake runs with no barrier or presence-sensing device at the point of operation, and an operator's hand enters the die. OSHA cites 1910.212(a)(1) and (a)(3)(ii) for the unguarded point of operation: among the most common findings in amputation investigations, which carry serious penalties from $16,550.

Illustrative example, not a specific OSHA case.

Machine Guarding compliance checklist

Use this to evaluate your compliance with 29 CFR 1910.212. Each item is a key requirement OSHA may verify during an inspection.

  • Survey every machine for point-of-operation, nip-point, rotating-part, and flying-chip/spark hazards.
  • Provide a guard or safeguarding device that keeps body parts out of the danger zone during the operating cycle.
  • Ensure guards are secured, durable, and do not themselves create a hazard.
  • Anchor fixed machines so they cannot move or walk during operation.
  • Pair guarding with a Lockout/Tagout program for servicing and maintenance (1910.147).
  • Train operators on the guards, why they matter, and never to bypass or remove them.

2026 penalties for 29 CFR 1910.212

Maximums set by 29 CFR 1903.15(d). 2026 amounts unchanged from 2025 (no CPI adjustment; OMB M-26-11). Not an increase. The 2025 OSHA penalty levels remain in effect for 2026; OSHA made no inflation adjustment for 2026. 29 CFR 1903.15 identifies January 15, 2025 as the effective reference for these amounts, while OSHA's public penalties page currently references penalties assessed after Jan. 15, 2026.

Violation typeMinimumMaximumWhen it applies
Serious$1,085$16,550Substantial probability of death or serious physical harm.
Other-Than-Serious$0$16,550Relates to safety/health but unlikely to cause death or serious harm.
Willful$11,823$165,514Intentional, knowing, or voluntary disregard of the requirement.
Repeated$4,256$165,514A substantially similar violation cited within the last 5 years.
Failure to AbateNone$16,550/dayup to $16,550 per day; total capped at 30x the daily amount (FOM Ch.6)

Machine guarding is a top-cited standard and a routine focus after an amputation, which is separately reportable to OSHA within 24 hours. Serious violations reach $16,550 and willful or repeat violations $165,514; multiple unguarded machines yield multiple citations.

Maximums and the willful minimum are set by 29 CFR 1903.15(d); the serious and repeated minimums are OSHA policy floors from its annual penalty adjustment memo. OSHA applies gravity-based and size, good-faith and history reductions (FOM CPL 02-00-164 Ch.6). Estimates only, not legal advice.

The business case for Machine Guarding compliance

Unguarded machinery is a leading cause of workplace amputations, and machine guarding (1910.212) ranked tenth on OSHA's FY2025 list of most-cited standards. A single unguarded nip point or point of operation can take a finger or a hand in an instant, and these injuries are permanent and life-altering.

Free compliance tools for 29 CFR 1910.212

Machine Guarding penalties by state

Penalties and enforcement vary by state. State-Plan states may impose higher penalties and additional requirements beyond federal 29 CFR 1910.212.

Frequently asked questions about 29 CFR 1910.212

What does OSHA's machine guarding standard require?

Under 1910.212(a)(1), employers must provide one or more methods of machine guarding to protect operators and other employees from hazards such as those created by the point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, and flying chips and sparks. The point of operation must be guarded whenever its operation could injure an employee, and the guard must prevent any part of the body from entering the danger zone during the operating cycle.

What is the difference between machine guarding and lockout/tagout?

Machine guarding (1910.212) protects workers during normal production: barriers and devices keep hands and bodies out of moving parts while the machine runs. Lockout/tagout (1910.147) protects workers during servicing and maintenance, when guards may be removed and the machine's energy must be isolated so it cannot start unexpectedly. They cover the same machines at different times, and most operations need both: guarding for run-time and LOTO for service-time.

What hazards does machine guarding protect against?

The four categories named in 1910.212(a)(1): the point of operation (where the machine cuts, shapes, or forms material), ingoing nip points (where two parts move together, such as belts and pulleys or meshing gears), rotating parts (shafts, spindles, couplings), and flying chips and sparks. Acceptable methods include fixed barrier guards, interlocked guards, two-hand controls, and presence-sensing devices, provided they keep the body out of the danger zone.

Do machines have to be anchored?

Machines designed for a fixed location must be securely anchored to prevent walking or moving during operation, under 1910.212(a)(5). This prevents a machine from shifting under vibration or load in a way that could injure a worker or create new hazards. Portable and mobile machines that are not designed for a fixed location are addressed by their own applicable requirements.

Regulatory history of 29 CFR 1910.212

1910.212 is one of OSHA's original 1971 general-industry standards, adopted from national consensus standards. It remains the catch-all machine-guarding requirement for machines not addressed by a more specific standard (such as 1910.213 woodworking machinery or 1910.217 mechanical power presses), and it works together with the 1989 Lockout/Tagout standard (1910.147).

Related glossary terms

Key terms that appear in 29 CFR 1910.212, each with a full plain-English explainer.

Primary sources

OSHA figures on this page are imported from HazComFast's verified regulatory module (verified 2026-10-05 against eCFR, OSHA.gov, and the Federal Register).

This page is an educational summary, not legal advice. OSHA standards and penalty amounts change; confirm requirements against the current regulation and your applicable State-Plan before acting.

Get the Binder in Order Before the Inspector Arrives. Are You Ready?

OSHA does not give advance notice of inspections (29 CFR 1903.6). Get the binder in order before the opening conference, not during it.

Serious Violation

$16,550

per violation (max)

HazComFast Pro

$199/mo

10 jobsites, unlimited chemicals, unlimited workers

New sign-ups are paused. The free tools below need no account, and customers can log in as usual.

Your account keeps working as usual. Cancel anytime.